| 作者 |
 经济增长What's So Good ? from Harvard professor: (zt) |
 |
ceo/cfo
[博客]
[个人文集]
头衔: 海归中将
声望: 院士
性别: 
加入时间: 2004/11/05
文章: 12941
海归分: 491638
|
|
|
作者：ceo/cfo 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
What's So Good About Growth
THE MORAL CONSEQUENCES
OF ECONOMIC GROWTH
By Benjamin M. Friedman
Knopf； 592pp； $35
(Readers' Reviews below)Editor's Review
The Good Ground-breaking thinking from a top economist on the moral value of growth.
The Bad Longer than it needed to be.
The Bottom Line Read this book to understand the links between technological, economic, and moral progress.
The title of Harvard University economist Benjamin M. Friedman's new book, The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth, might seem a bit off-key. After all, politicians and economists typically focus on the material benefits of growth －－ more and better jobs, higher gross domestic product, larger incomes, and more money available for government programs. And companies such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (CSCO ) typically point to economic benefits, such as low prices for consumers and jobs for workers, when they want to justify their business policies.
But the narrowness of the public discussion is exactly what Friedman wants to address. "Our conventional thinking about economic growth fails to reflect the breadth of what growth, or its absence, means for a society," he writes. "Growth is valuable not only for our material improvement but also for how it affects our social attitudes and our political institutions －－ in other words, our society's moral character."
The real benefit of growth, Friedman argues, is that it encourages a wide range of social virtues, including dedication to democracy, tolerance of diversity, social mobility, and commitment to fairness. By contrast, he writes, "when living standards stagnate or decline, most societies make little if any progress toward any of these goals, and in all too many instances they plainly retrogress."
The book, at almost 600 pages, is too long and quite repetitive in spots. And it doesn't pack the punch of Friedman's influential 1988 book, Day of Reckoning: The Consequences of American Economic Policy Under Reagan and After, which warned that massive budget deficits were going to badly damage the U.S. economy.
But in this book Friedman has scored a dead-center hit on the critical question: Why do we value economic growth? The usual argument is that a bigger GDP －－ more goods and services －－ leads to happier, more satisfied citizens. But that apparently simple proposition turns out to be far more complicated. As Friedman notes, there is plenty of evidence that people judge their well-being by comparing themselves to others. As the average income in a country goes up, so do expectations. As a result, the level of GDP per person in a country, taken alone, doesn't necessarily say much about the level of happiness.
The lack of a direct link between personal satisfaction and the level of GDP per person seems to undercut the purely economic arguments in favor of growth. After all, why should we undergo all the turmoil of technological change and economic restructuring if more gadgets and bigger homes aren't going to make us happier in the end?
Friedman argues that economic growth has a key additional benefit: As long as people see their own income rising, they worry less about doing better than others. And that in turn creates a more favorable environment for political and social advances. To demonstrate this point, he draws on economic studies and historical examples, both American and global. In the 1700s, he points out, it became accepted that the rise of commercial and trading activity was a force for positive legal and institutional change. Adam Smith, for one, believed that moral progress went hand in hand with economic progress, as voluntary exchange replaced the use of force.
Friedman points to the the Ku Klux Klan in the U.S. and the Nazis in Germany as examples of what can happen when growth vanishes. And he worries that "rising intolerance and incivility and the eroding generosity and openness...have been, in significant part, a consequence of the stagnation of American middle class living standards during much of the last quarter of the twentieth century."
Friedman is forthright about admitting that the New Deal doesn't fit his argument. He says the hard times of the Great Depression brought forth a virtue: a generous public response. But the New Deal was "exceptional," says Friedman, arguing that rising incomes in general make people more willing to help others.
The link between economic growth and democracy also works on a global level. The movement toward civil liberties and open societies, says Friedman, has been most successful in countries with rising incomes: He predicts China will take this same path.
This is not a politically biased book －－ you would have a hard time telling from it whether Friedman is a Republican or a Democrat. But it does provide a new framework and language for discussing economic growth, one that's useful for economists, politicians, and business leaders alike. The goal is not simply more, but more moral.
作者：ceo/cfo 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
| 相关主题 |
| [原创]寻找我国新的经济增长点
|
海归茶馆 |
2016-7-03 周日, 15:22 |
| [原创]寻找我国新的经济增长点
|
海归茶馆 |
2016-7-02 周六, 18:21 |
| 华尔街日报：看衰中国经济增长前景 热钱流出中国
|
海归商务 |
2012-8-16 周四, 20:23 |
| [转帖]中美经济增长可能发生逆转
|
海归商务 |
2012-7-30 周一, 03:28 |
| [ZT] 无节制地追求“经济增长”，每一天把人类推向坟墓，离坟墓更近。
|
海归商务 |
2012-7-09 周一, 09:10 |
| [转帖]中国经济增长还能“雄风”再继吗？——经济危机制造的巴东杀吏案
|
海归主坛 |
2009-5-26 周二, 14:41 |
| [转帖]国际能源署：对中国官方经济增长数据表示怀疑
|
海归主坛 |
2009-5-15 周五, 10:23 |
| 2009年中国经济增长速度下调,银行业作为周期性很强的行业会首当其冲, 投...
|
海归主坛 |
2009-1-11 周日, 03:40 |
| |
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
-
 经济增长What's So Good ? from Harvard professor: (zt) -- ceo/cfo - (4997 Byte) 2005-11-30 周三, 06:02 (783 reads)
|
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, |
|
|
