| 作者 |
 请教：企业估值 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
nothing wrong. -- hghg11 - (432 Byte) 2004-11-10 周三, 22:40 (388 reads) |
Manchester Tina
头衔: 海归中校
加入时间: 2004/10/04
文章: 584
海归分: 58400
|
|
|
作者：Manchester Tina 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
when we use the common bid for Enterprise value , Enterprise value equals to equity + liabilities -Current assets, but don't forget equity include an item Revaluation surplus! If the buyer pay the Revaluation surplus, that is a deal. But they did not mention about that. It means the seller lose this part of income. It is case not reasonable for the seller in the western world. However, there is not in the same track in China. The Revaluation surplus is very abstract (same as the goodwill by using the method I mention below).
Therefore, should think about it carefully.
作者：Manchester Tina 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
-
 请教：企业估值 -- 高圣 - (85 Byte) 2004-11-10 周三, 19:40 (1636 reads) - nothing wrong. -- hghg11 - (432 Byte) 2004-11-10 周三, 22:40 (388 reads)
- Sorry, I can't agree. I don't think it is reasonable for the seller if it is in western world. Because -- Manchester Tina - (577 Byte) 2004-11-10 周三, 23:52 (379 reads)
|
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, |
|
|
